Posts from June, 2009

From Jewish Hero to Jewish Agency Leader

By Sam Sokolove on Friday, June 26th, 2009 at 8:03 am
Categories: Uncategorized

(The following is from The Jewish Agency, which is funded by United Jewish Communities, major Jewish federations in North America — including the Jewish Federation of New Mexico — Keren Hayesod, the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews, foundations and donors from Israel and around the world.

His name is synonymous with struggle and survival in the face of evil and hatred. Internationally recognized as a human rights activist, accomplished author, acclaimed statesman and esteemed politician, Nathan Sharansky’s iconic history is now set to merge with the Jewish Agency: Following the Nomination Committee’s approval, Natan Sharansky will be presented for election to Chairman of the Executive of the Jewish Agency at our Board of Governor’s Closing Plenary on Thursday June 25th.

20th century Jewish history is deeply intertwined with Sharansky’s personal experience, from anti-semitism and persecution to aliyah and even government. Older generations of Jews and Christians around the world stood by Sharansky when he most needed our vocal outcries of support demanding his freedom. While younger generations know him as an enlightened politician and speaker, including number eleven on the list of TIME magazine’s 100 most influential people of 2005 in the “Scientists and Thinkers” category.

As we look back on 80 years of the Jewish Agency’s exciting, challenging and extraordinary accomplishments, Sharansky’s appointment offers a new promise for our collective future. His personal experiences and professional achievements coincide directly with our central mission: from strengthening Jewish identity to rescuing Jews in distress, and from advancing aliyah to securing a strong Jewish peoplehood.

With great pride and deep respect in our hearts, we are proud to call upon Natan Sharansky as the Jewish Agency’s Chairman of the Executive. May we go from strength to strength together in the coming years of our joint venture.
sharansky


Response to “Billboards are False Advertising”

By Sam Sokolove on Friday, June 26th, 2009 at 7:48 am
Categories: Uncategorized

We note with concern the article by Sam Sokolove of June 1 posted on www.nmisrael.org, “Anti-Israel Billboards are Simply False Advertising.”

As Jews with long-standing ties with the Albuquerque/Santa Fe community, we are disappointed that Mr. Sokolove misrepresented the views of a growing element within the New Mexico Jewish community who seek to express their displeasure with repeated violations of Palestinian human rights by Israel.

The billboard in question, contrary to Mr. Sokolove’s assertions, was not designed to “send a message of hate to Albuquerqueans,” but rather to bring to the attention of the public the fact that their tax dollars were being used to support military action in Gaza that resulted in the death of over 1,300 Palestinians, including hundreds of children. By misstating that the billboard contained “the egregious image of a Palestinian child in the crosshairs of an Israeli tank,” [there were no crosshairs represented on the billboard], Mr. Sokolove falsely accused the supporters of the billboard of suggesting that the Israelis deliberately targeted Palestinian children. The billboard simply expressed a series of undisputed facts: (1) the United States provides billions of dollars in military aid to Israel; (2) Israel used this aid in its attacks on Gaza in December and January; and (3) hundreds of children died in these attacks.

We agree with Mr. Sokolove that many of these issues are deserving of a vigorous debate within the Jewish community, such as the questions of the disproportionate response by the Israel military in Gaza; which side bears a greater degree of responsibility for the high levels of death and destruction; the “basic righteousness of the Israeli cause;” and the relative influence of AIPAC and other pro-Israeli support groups on US foreign policy. Unfortunately, under Mr. Sokolove’s “ground rules,” people who do not support his position are excluded from the discussion.

Neither we, or anyone with whom we are associated in our promotion of peace and justice issues, “tacitly champion terror, propagate anti-Semitism [or] support the targeting of Israeli civilians for the crime of their nationality,” and we deeply resent the insinuation. To rely on these tired and unjustified stereotypes equating criticism of Israel with terror and anti-Semitism debases the argument and stifles dialogue.

Stanley Handmaker, MD, Ph.D.

Stanley M. Hordes, Ph.D.


Trader Joe’s Boycott: Take Action!

By Sam Sokolove on Thursday, June 18th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Categories: Israel, News, Uncategorized

It has come to our attention that the anti-Israel groups under the umbrella of the “U.S. Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel” recently sent form letters to Trader Joe’s headquarters demanding the company stop carrying Israeli products as these products “help fund an economy based on illegal occupation and apartheid.”

The Anti-Defamation League Central Pacific office sent a letter to Trader Joe’s and received a response from Jon Basalone, Trader Joe’s Senior Vice President of Marketing. He wrote, “We have received a few letters [threatening a boycott] like this via our customer relations email. Our response is that we sell products, and do not use our products as political tools or to make any statements about any political causes. We have no intention of removing any products based on pressure from any group, no matter what they support or don’t support. As always, we believe our customers are smart, and they are capable of making decisions about what they purchase.”

Anti-Israel activists in Pittsburgh walked into a Trader Joe’s and proceeded to pull Israeli goods and distribute misinformation materials to customers before being removed for trespassing. Additionally we have heard word about this from the JCRCs in Nashville and Silicon Valley.

The anti-Israel groups have called for a national day of de-shelving Israeli products from Trader Joe’s stores on Saturday, June 20, World Refugee Day.

Suggested Actions

• We encourage community members to shop at Trader Joe’s stores and to specifically buy Israeli products, particularly before and during the weekend of June 20. It would be fantastic if all the Israeli products are gone before the boycotters arrive.

• Israeli products carried at Trader Joe’s include: Dorot Crushed Garlic, Dorot Chopped Cilantro, Holyland Matzos, Pastures of Eden Feta Imported, Trader Joe’s Israeli Couscous and Trader Joe’s Harvest Grains Blend.

• Tell managers at Trader Joe’s stores that you really like the Israeli products they carry and hope they will carry more in the future.

• Alert managers that June 20 has been declared as a day to de-shelve Israeli products and they should be aware of any people who may try to vandalize, shoplift, or deface the products in any way.


Developing a Comprehensive Community-Based Iran Advocacy Strategy

By Sam Sokolove on Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 at 7:40 am
Categories: Iran, Uncategorized

By Martin J. Raffel
Can anyone doubt that Iran is getting very close to nuclear arms capability? This from an article inside The New York Times on June 6: “A week before Iran’s presidential election, atomic inspectors reported Friday that the country has sped up its production of nuclear fuel and increased its number of installed centrifuges to 7,200 – more than enough, weapon experts said, to make fuel for up to two nuclear weapons a year, if the country decided to use its facilities for that purpose.”

Given the existential threat that this situation poses to Israel as well as its enormous detrimental impact on fundamental American national interests, I have been perplexed by absence of a powerful grassroots response in recent years, at the least from the American Jewish community. Perhaps one of the reasons is that we have been talking about the danger of a nuclear armed Iran for many years – indeed, I recall in 1993 Israel explained its decision to seek peace with the PLO in terms of more serious dangers on the outer geographic rim, especially Iran and Iraq armed with weapons of mass distraction. Crises normally arise, we respond to them, and then they recede within a relatively short period of time. This is a “crisis” that has lasted 16 years!

In an effort to stir things up, I resorted to “scare tactics” in the form of an op-ed piece I’ve published a number of weeks ago called “Thinking the Unthinkable.” The piece drew upon a fictitious description of the impact of atomic bombs in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Haifa. “In Haifa, entire freighters were swallowed up in the fire in the water, incinerating and drowning at the same time. The light was so strong, so blinding, that millions of people died without knowing what it was…. They disappeared, leaving thin, accurately drawn traces of their silhouettes on cement walls, floors, things that remained standing. Every single leaf on every single carefully tended and manicured branch on every single tree in the Bahai garden burned off in an instant…. Buildings near the port slid down the molten hills and into the seething sea.”

Iran cannot be business as usual, starting with the structures we have in place to deal with this issue. At the national level, we have created an interagency task force, involving the Conference of Presidents, UJC, the JCPA, AIPAC, national community relations and membership agencies, the religious movements and others. And the Israel Advocacy Initiative, a joint project of UJC and JCPA, has formed a working group to promote stronger community-based Iran advocacy. This framework assures our ability at the national level to maximize coordination and outreach, plan major initiatives, like a mass gathering in New York this fall in conjunction with the UN General Assembly that is directed to the international community, and a one-day leadership fly-in to Washington, DC directed to our government

Our hope is that local communities, with JCRCs serving as the central addresses, will also establish special Iran working groups modeled on national, and will include not just the “usual suspects,” but a broad representative group that includes local constituents of national agencies, religious leaders, social action chairs from synagogues, and select others with outreach potential in the community. Such coordinating bodies allow for greater coordination of information flow, development of agreed-upon messages and mechanisms for impact.

What is our role? To create a public opinion environment, to fill the public square with voices, that will convey to decision-makers in Washington, DC and in our communities that there is broad American support for an URGENT and SUSTAINED effort to divert Iran from its nuclear program. The word President Obama used during the campaign about the nuclear armed Iran was “unacceptable.” We agree, and now we have to make sure our leadership understands the importance of translating that “pledge” into reality.

Components of an effective community-based Iran advocacy program: We need to educate and mobilize Jews and non-Jews; use the media to get our messages out; communicate with national, state and local public officials on range of issues including federal legislation as described previously by the AIPAC representative and divestment; and communicate with representatives of foreign governments, including consuls general.

For community leadership: organize educational programs in the Jewish and general communities, meet with members of Congress, editors, key religious, civic and business leaders, foreign diplomats; place op-ed pieces and participate in radio/TV programs. For the grassroots: attend educational forums; supply volumes of letters and calls to the White House and members of Congress, possibly rotating responsibility among the synagogues; monitor and call-in radio programs; participate in Congressional town hall meetings; talk to friends and colleagues.

While the Jewish community inevitably will be the primary engine for this advocacy, don’t give up on recruiting non-Jewish allies to this cause. A nuclear armed Iran is not only a threat to Israel. It is a threat to moderate Arabs, Europe, the United States, the entire global community. UANI, whose representative you heard from before, was formed to provide a framework for American involvement across political, religious and ethnic lines. Also, remember, stopping Iran through diplomatic and economic measures, averting any possible need for forceful intervention, is not a right wing position — essentially, it is an antiwar position. My advice is not to look too hard for organizations to join a formal Iran coalition. Instead, we should strive to fill the public square with diverse voices by identifying and recruiting select prominent non-Jewish leaders who will associate themselves with public statements, op-ed pieces, letters-to-the-editor, ads, etc., and who will speak at public forums.

Finally, many communities have found it useful to broaden the agenda beyond the nuclear issue to include human rights, religious freedom, status of women, etc. There are potential allies out there who will be responsive to those issues.


Twelve Ways to Prevent Iran from Acquiring Nuclear Weapons without War

By Sam Sokolove on Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Categories: Iran, News

The following is from The Israel Project
www.theisraelproject.org

Iran is moving steadfastly toward acquiring the capability to make nuclear weapons. Last month it successfully test-fired a solid-fuel missile with a range of 1,200 miles – a weapons delivery system able to reach most countries in the Middle East and some in Europe. The world does not have a lot of time to prevent Iran, the world’s largest state sponsor of terror, from getting these weapons. It will take the will of key countries to stop Iran. Following are twelve ideas – carrots and sticks – that can be used to persuade Iran’s leaders that it is in their interest to end Iran’s nuclear weapons program and support of terror – without military action or regime change. All peaceful means must be used; at the same time, all options should be left on the table. Nothing would be more dangerous than Iran with nuclear weapons.

1. Cut off the sale of gasoline to Iran: The biggest stick the international community can wield remains Iran’s dependence on imported gasoline. Iran has not developed enough capacity to refine its crude oil into gasoline. It therefore imports 40 percent of the gasoline it needs – almost all of it from Swiss, Dutch, French, British and Indian companies. When Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad rationed gasoline during the summer of 2007, violent protests broke out, forcing him to end the rationing. These European and Indian governments should stop companies based in their countries from selling gasoline to Iran.

2. Ban investments in Iran’s energy sector: In addition to cutting off gasoline sales, the international community, led by the United Sates, should provide incentives to foreign banks and companies to eliminate investments in Iran’s energy sector. This would prevent foreign oil companies from investing in Iran’s oil industry.

3. Eliminate the purchase of oil from Iran: Iran derives an estimated 85 percent of its revenue from its oil sales. Iran’s leaders use oil revenues to subsidize heavily the prices of gasoline, food, housing and other necessities. Clearly, a severe reduction in these revenues would have a strong impact on Iran’s people and leaders.

4. Sustain international pressure on foreign banks and oil companies to halt their dealings with Iran’s energy sector: International pressure on foreign banks and oil companies already has led major firms worldwide, such as Germany’s Deutsche Bank and Commerzbank, England’s HSBC, Credit Suisse and Royal Dutch Shell, to halt or limit their business with Iran.

5. Freeze Iranian bank assets and impose sanctions on Iranian entities linked to its nuclear program: In June 2008, all of the EU’s 27 member states agreed to freeze any assets held in their jurisdictions by Bank Melli, Iran’s largest state-owned bank which has been labeled a nuclear proliferator by the EU, US and Australia for its role in Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile program. In March 2009, the US Treasury Department imposed sanctions on 11 companies linked to Bank Melli. In February 2009, officials from France, Britain and Germany issued a list of 34 Iranian entities allegedly linked to Iran’s nuclear or biological weapons programs. Measures such as these must be broadened.

6. End World Bank contributions to Iran: In 2008 millions of dollars in financial guarantees were provided to Iran’s industrial and natural gas sectors through the World Bank’s Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA). The international community should demand that future MIGA outlays not end up in Iranian hands.

7. Stop pipeline deals with Iran: There are a number of major pipeline deals with Iran that will enable Tehran to transfer and sell natural gas to Europe. The Nabucco pipeline and others, worth billions of dollars, would seriously erode the impact of economic sanctions that could halt Iran’s nuclear program.

8. Halt arms sales to Iran: Because Iran’s missile defense system is antiquated, Tehran seeks to purchase advanced weapons systems. Media reports at the end of 2008 indicate that Russia signed an agreement to sell its S-300 air-defense missiles, among the most sophisticated in the world, to Iran. Later reports state that Russia has decided not to sell this system to Iran. One speculated reason is that Iran could not make payments. Iran’s acquiring this system would significantly change the military balance in the Middle East.

9. Deny shipping insurance to companies helping Iran: UN Security Council Resolution 1803 calls on all states to “exercise vigilance” with regard to companies that do business with Iran in order to avoid financing Iran’s proliferation activities. The resolution specifically cautions states to be wary of granting insurance to businesses trading with Iran. It also focuses on export credits and loan guarantees. Insurance companies could increase the cost of doing business in or with Iran by reassessing their rates in view of Iran’s questionable stability. Transit insurance could also be raised for ships and merchandise passing through Iran.

10. Intelligence: Gathering accurate and actionable intelligence about Iran’s nuclear program is key to preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. The international community, led by the United States, should intensify its efforts at gathering such intelligence, upgrade the tools and facilitate greater cooperation among the world’s intelligence organizations.

11. Divestment: American states and investors are taking the lead in incorporating “terror-free” investing principles to remove a source of income from Tehran’s leaders. Governments and investors around the world should pursue similar principles in their investment strategies.

12. Impose inspections and restrictions on Iranian goods and officials: Stringent inspections of items entering or leaving Iran should be carried out, and strict international travel prohibitions should be imposed on Iranian officials, except for nuclear negotiators.


Talking Points on Settlements

By Sam Sokolove on Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009 at 11:10 am
Categories: Media, News

Israel strongly desires peace with the Palestinians and the entire Arab world.

As Prime Minister Netanyahu said in Washington after his meeting with President Obama on May 18, “I want to make it clear that we don’t want to govern the Palestinians. We want to live in peace with them.” He also expressed readiness to engage immediately and unconditionally in intensive bilateral negotiations with the Palestinian leadership to resolve all outstanding issues.

Israel and the Palestinian leadership agreed to the terms of the Quartet’s performance-based Roadmap for Peace and both sides should be expected to fulfill their obligations under it.

The question of Jewish settlement in the West Bank and Gaza Strip has long been a source of disagreement between Israeli governments and American administrations. We urge both the Obama administration and Netanyahu government not to allow any current differences over settlements to obscure the fundamental agreement they share on the broad geo-strategic challenges in the Middle East, including the need to reach a negotiated settlement between Israel and the Palestinians.

We believe that it would be a fundamental mistake for the United States to consider using any disagreement over settlements as a rationale for withholding economic, diplomatic or military support necessary for Israel’s security and survival.


Anti-Israel Billboards are Simply False Advertising

By Sam Sokolove on Monday, June 1st, 2009 at 10:17 am
Categories: Uncategorized

It’s difficult not to feel some sympathy for Lamar Advertising, the Louisiana-based company that found its New Mexico office caught between a very small cadre of anti-Israel activists who rented ten billboards to spread a message of hate to Albuquerqueans, and the legions of individuals who subsequently phoned or e-mailed to request that this message be removed.
While the initial efforts of these citizens succeeded in having the egregious image of a Palestinian child in the crosshairs of an Israeli tank taken down, it appears that the activists may persist in getting their message seen once again.

Therefore, it’s worth keeping a few facts in mind.

Firstly, Americans have a deep-seated, historic disdain for false advertising, and the message of these billboards — that Israel, and by extension, the United States, is participating in the targeted killing of children — is as untrue as it is simply grotesque. As we know, Israel’s recent military action in Gaza was in response to years of countless missiles being launched by Hamas terrorists into densely populated areas in Israel. The loss of Palestinian life — especially children — is a tragically direct consequence of Hamas’s actions, which are deliberately centered in schools and hospitals where civilian casualties can be maximized.

These deaths are to be mourned as examples of the ultimate cost of terror, not to be cynically politicized.

As for U.S. aid to Israel, indeed, nearly 90 percent of US aid to Israel is military, but this investment of one-tenth of 1% of the US budget allows Israel, the United States’ primary ally in the Middle East, to continue to serve as a key strategic partner in the War Against Terror, with Israel continuously offering intelligence and threat-assessments on an array of groups and countries that are enemies of America in particular, democracy in general, and the values that Israel and the United States share.

Meanwhile, this is far from a one-sided arrangement: thanks in part to the American investment, economic cooperation between the US and Israel has increased dramatically over the years; Israel is New Mexico’s eleventh largest trading partner, with exports such as electronic products, machinery for manufacturing and mining-related tools jumping significantly. This partnership is underscored by the recently created Sister City program between the Israeli city of Rehovot and Albuquerque, which promises an ongoing exchange of high-tech, medicine and culture that will enrich both cities.

From a purely public relations perspective, a garish billboard will not sway American opinions: according to a March, 2009 Gallup poll, nearly 6 in 10 Americans say their sympathies lie more with the Israelis than Palestinians, identical to polls conducted in February 2008, and consistent with findings each year since 2006. Also, 63% of Americans hold a favorable view of Israel, with 21% holding a “very” favorable view of that country. This isn’t to suggest that Israel does everything right, or that Israeli governmental policies are universally supported by Americans or everyone within the American Jewish community.

But what remains strong among most Americans is the sense of the basic righteousness of the Israeli cause despite the onslaught of some very hostile neighbors. Contrary to the conspiracy theorists who accuse the nefarious “Zionist lobby,” as being behind the appeals to Lamar Advertising, is evident that the calls came from individuals who constitute the majority of the population who understand what Israel is up against.

Another commonly heard canard from anti-Israel activists is that dialogue on the Israel-Palestinian conflict is somehow being stifled by the
aforementioned “lobby”, but the facts indicate just the opposite: locally, venues are regularly offered for meaningful discussion, ranging from forums at synagogues and community centers and the pages of the New Mexico Jewish Link, yielding a range of opinions that run the gamut from the most stridently hawkish to left-of-left Dove. But any discussion needs ground rules, and one that we personally hold is that it is futile to discuss the conflict with those who argue against Israel’s right to exist. Such views do not represent valid perspectives, but rather extremist ideas divorced from reality and humane ideals alike.

Adding insult to injury is that these opinions are often heard from individuals who are motivated by the self-proclaimed causes of “peace and justice” when their affiliations are with groups that tacitly champion terror, propagate anti-Semitism and support the targeting of Israeli civilians for the crime of their nationality. People who truly care about peace between Israelis and Palestinian recognize that propaganda like these billboards that demonize rather than inform is ultimately counterproductive, and do nothing to advance the cause of possible conciliation.

One of the key anti-Israel activists may have declared in an e-mail to allies that, “I believe we are now witnessing the beginning of the end of Israel,” but last month, more than 300 Albuquerqueans representing many different faiths and backgrounds came out to celebrate Israel’s 61st Birthday at the Jewish Community Center in Albuquerque. Ultimately, it’s this celebration of the continuing, deepening bonds between New Mexico and Israel that is worth discussing, not the efforts of a few misguided people with a short-term advertising contract.


All content Copyright © 2009 by The Jewish Federation of New Mexico
Designed, developed, and maintained by netwmd.com, LLC