Posts in the 'Advocacy' Category

Gaza Flotilla Incident: Background from Jewish Federations of North America

By Sam Sokolove on Tuesday, June 1st, 2010 at 1:34 pm
Categories: Advocacy, News

Early on the morning of May 31, Israel Defense Forces naval forces intercepted six ships attempting to break the naval blockade of the Gaza Strip.

The intercept took place after numerous warnings from Israel and the Israel Navy that were issued prior to the action. The Israel Navy requested the ships to redirect toward Ashdod, where they would be able to unload their cargo which would then be transferred to Gaza over land after undergoing security inspections. The IDF stressed that the passengers could then return to their point of departure on the same vessels.

During the interception of the ships, the demonstrators onboard attacked the IDF naval personnel with live gunfire as well as light weaponry including knives, crowbars and clubs. The demonstrators had clearly prepared weapons in advance for this specific purpose.

According to reports from sea, on board the flotilla that was seeking to break the maritime closure on the Gaza Strip, IDF forces apprehended two violent activists holding pistols. These militants apparently grabbed the pistols from IDF forces and opened fire on the soldiers.

The activists were carrying 10,000 tons of reported aid to Gaza. Israel provides 15,000 tons of aid weekly to Gaza.

As a result of this life-threatening activity, naval forces employed riot dispersal means, including, when they determined that their lives were in immediate danger, live fire. According to initial reports, these events resulted in at least 9 deaths among the demonstrators and numerous injured.

A number of Israeli naval personnel were injured, some from gunfire and others from knives and crowbars. Two of the soldiers are seriously wounded and the remainder sustained light injuries.

All of the injured, Israelis and foreigners, are currently being evacuated by a fleet of IDF helicopters to hospitals in Israel.

Reports from IDF forces on the scene are that some of the participants onboard the ships had planned a lynch-mob attack, using lethal force on the boarding forces.

The events are still unfolding. The ships have been berthed in the Ashdod port, where IDF naval forces will perform security checks in order to identify the people on board the ships and their equipment.

The IDF naval operation was carried out under orders from the political leadership to halt the flotilla from reaching the Gaza Strip and breaching the naval blockade.

Other important facts:

The provocateurs were organized by an Islamist organization that has links to fundamentalist jihadi groups. The extremists brought small children on board knowing that they intended to violate international maritime law.

The activists were carrying 10,000 tons of what they said was aid. Israel transfers about 15,000 tons of supplies and humanitarian aid every week to the people of Gaza.

Israel has said that it will deliver any humanitarian aid to Gaza, as it does daily.

“We fully intend to go to Gaza regardless of any intimidation or threats of violence against us, they are going to have to forcefully stop us,” said one of the flotilla’s organizers. Using the Arabic term ‘intifada,’ Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said “We call on all Arabs and Muslims to rise up in front of Zionist embassies across the whole world. Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh said this week: “If the ships reach Gaza it is a victory; if they are intercepted, it will be a victory too.”

Israel left Gaza in hopes of peace in 2005 and in return received more than 10,000 rockets and terrorist attacks.

No country would allow illegal entry of any vessel into their waters without a security check.

Earlier this week, Noam Shalit, father of Hamas-held Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, approached the flotilla’s organizers asking them to take supplies to Gilad. He was refused.


Top Ten Lies About Israel

By Sam Sokolove on Wednesday, May 5th, 2010 at 10:19 am
Categories: Advocacy, Israel

By Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center

It’s no secret to anyone that relations between the United States and Israel reflect a new reality and are not what they once were. The last few months have seen a worldwide frenzy of intimidation and threats directed against Israel that has backed its supporters into a corner. Very few have raised their voices in response.

For this reason, the Simon Wiesenthal Center has produced a new brochure, “2010 Top Ten Anti-Israel Lies,” that we will be distributing to millions of people worldwide. The brochure also provides contact information for U.S. and world leaders and key news bureaus.

Here is a condensed summary of the 10 top lies and the center’s responses:

Lie No. 1: Israel was created by European guilt over the Nazi Holocaust. Why should Palestinians pay the price?

Three thousand years before the Holocaust, before there was a Roman Empire, Israel’s kings and prophets walked the streets of Jerusalem. The whole world knows that Isaiah did not speak his prophesies from Portugal, nor Jeremiah his lamentations from France. Revered by its people, Jerusalem is mentioned in the Hebrew Scriptures 600 times, but not once in the Koran. Throughout the 2,000-year exile of the Jews, there was a continuous Jewish presence in the Holy Land.

Lie No. 2: Had Israel withdrawn to its June 1967 borders, peace would have come long ago.

Since 1967, Israel repeatedly has conceded “land for peace.” Following Egyptian President Sadat’s historic 1977 visit to Jerusalem, Israel withdrew from the vast Sinai Peninsula and has been at peace with Egypt ever since. But the Palestinian Authority has never fulfilled its promise to end propaganda attacks nor drop the Palestinian National Charter’s call for Israel’s destruction. In 2000, Prime Minister Barak offered Yasser Arafat full sovereignty more than 97 percent of the West Bank, a corridor to Gaza, and a capital in the Arab section of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.

Lie No. 3: Israel is the main stumbling block to achieving a two-state solution.

The Palestinians themselves are the only stumbling block to achieving a two-state solution. With whom should Israel negotiate? With President Abbas, who for four years has been barred by Hamas from visiting 1.5 million constituents in Gaza? With his Palestinian Authority, which continues to glorify terrorists and preaches hate in its educational system and the media? With Hamas, whose Iranian-backed leaders deny the Holocaust and use fanatical Jihadist rhetoric to call for Israel’s destruction?

Lie No. 4: Nuclear Israel, not Iran, is the greatest threat to peace and stability.

The United States and Europe can afford to wait to see what the Iranian regime does with its nuclear ambitions, but Israel cannot. Israel is on the front lines and remembers every day the price the Jewish people paid for not taking Hitler at his word. Israel is not prepared to sacrifice another 6 million Jews on the altar of the world’s indifference.

Lie No. 5: Israel is an apartheid state deserving of international boycott, divestment and sanctions campaigns.

In fact, Israel is a democratic state. Its 20 percent Arab minority enjoys all the political, economic and religious rights and freedoms of citizenship, including electing members of their choice to the Knesset (Parliament).

Lie No. 6: Plans to build 1,600 more homes in East Jerusalem prove Israel is “Judaizing” the Holy City.

Ramat Shlomo was not about Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem but about a long established, heavily populated Jewish neighborhood in northern Jerusalem, where 250,000 Jews live (about the size of Newark, N.J.) — an area that will never be relinquished by Israel.

Lie No. 7: Israeli policies endanger U.S. troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

A resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict would benefit everyone, including the United States. But an imposed return to what Abba Eban called “1967 Auschwitz borders” would endanger Israel’s survival and ultimately be disastrous for American interests and credibility in the world.

Lie No. 8: Israeli policies are the cause of worldwide anti-Semitism.

From the Inquisition to the pogroms, to the 6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis, history proves that Jew hatred existed on a global scale before the creation of the State of Israel. It would still exist in 2010 even if Israel had never been created. For example, one poll indicates that 40 percent of Europeans blame the recent global economic crisis on “Jews having too much economic power” — a canard that has nothing to do with Israel.

Lie No. 9: Israel, not Hamas, is responsible for the “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza. Goldstone was right when he charged that Israel was guilty of war crimes against civilians.

The United Nations Human Rights Council is obsessed with false anti-Israel resolutions. It refuses to address grievous human rights abuses in Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Cuba and beyond. Faced with similar attacks, every U.N. member-state, including the United States and Canada, surely would have acted more aggressively than the Israel Defense Forces did in Gaza.

Lie No. 10: The only hope for peace is a single, binational state eliminating the Jewish State of Israel.

The one-state solution is a non-starter because it would eliminate the Jewish homeland. However, the current pressures on Israel are equally dangerous. In effect, the world is demanding that Israel, the size of New Jersey, shrink further by accepting a three-state solution: a P.A. state on the West Bank and a Hamas terrorist one in Gaza. All this as Hezbollah, Iran’s proxy in Lebanon, stockpiles 50,000 rockets, threatening northern and central Israel’s main population centers. Current polls show that while most Israelis favor a two-state solution, most Palestinians continue to oppose it.

Full versions of the brochure are available by e-mailing toptenlies@wiesenthal.net or calling (800) 900-9036. The online edition is available at http://www.wiesenthal.com/toptenlies.


The Ugly Truth about Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (DBS)

By Sam Sokolove on Thursday, March 25th, 2010 at 1:54 pm
Categories: Advocacy, Israel

“Every war against the Jews has begun with first demonizing us.”

Michael Oren, Israel’s ambassador to the U.S.

In recent years, the campaign to delegitimize and demonize Israel, which began in earnest at the 2001 UN Conference against Racism in Durban, has intensified. This campaign distorts the history and national aspirations of the Jewish people to live in peace in a homeland to which they have been connected continuously and profoundly for more than three millennia.

The legitimate right of Israel to defend itself from terror often is ignored. Israeli policy and actions are not beyond criticism; but we have witnessed a continuing flow of inaccurate charges of human rights violations and outrageous comparisons of Israel to apartheid South Africa and even to Nazi Germany.

Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions is part of a grand design to destroy Israel and her credibility in the world.

According to Abraham Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, “(BDS”) is about the three ‘D’s”: Demonization, Deligitimization, and Applying a Double Standard.”

Tactics of BDS:

  • Denying Israel’s cultural products;
  • Denying Israel’s emissaries the right to be heard;
  • Equating Israel to Apartheid-era South Africa;
  • Delegitimizing the Jewish historical ties to Israel;
  • Portraying Zionism not as an expression of Peoplehood, but as an extension of European colonialization;
  •  Equating Zionism to Nazism.

This is all anti-Semitism

BDS may seem innocuous, but we must understand what BDS proponents really want: Israel could be strangled economically and culturally if people of good concemeince do not counter this campaign.

  • The campaign to delegitimize Israel and the BDS movement, serves as a distraction from the critical task of trying to bring peace to the Middle East;
  • The promotion of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions against Israel evidences a troubling double standard – singling out Israel for blame;
  • The use of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian-Arab conflict is an effort to reward intransigence by suggesting that international pressure can replace efforts to negotiate in good faith.

Those opposed to the existence of the State of Israel are tenacious and will continue to intensify their campaign globally, within local communities and on the campuses.

You Can Fight Back!

  • Confront boycott campaigns with campaigns to purchase Israeli goods or partner with Israeli organizations, with the aim of ensuring that every boycott campaign is a net failure;
  • Respond swiftly to false or distorted media statements about Israel;
  • Invest in programs that promote peace and reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians;
  • Vigorously combat slanderous attacks, including anti-Semitic fabrications that have been levied against Israelis that are reminiscent of the ancient blood libel.

Action needed to combat campaign delegitimizing Israel

By Sam Sokolove on Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010 at 2:53 pm
Categories: Advocacy, Media

By Martin J. Raffel

The organized American Jewish community and our non-Jewish allies, with broad representation from across political and religious lines, are poised to launch a major initiative to counter the campaign to delegitimize Israel.

The sky is not falling. President Obama and the U.S. Congress remain firmly committed to Israel’s fundamental security, and opinion polls consistently reflect broad American public support for the Jewish state. But there are clouds gathering on the horizon that must not be ignored.

The delegitimization campaign — and make no mistake, it is a global campaign — has its roots in the international NGO gathering that took place alongside the 2001 U.N. conference on racism in Durban, South Africa. With the second intifada (more aptly described as “Arafat’s terror war”) raging, these anti-Israel NGOs decided to open up a second front to paint Israel as a pariah/apartheid state deserving of political and economic isolation.

Through the years, the principal weapons used by these groups are the boycott of Israeli products, people and events; divestment from Israeli companies and institutions, including Israel Bonds, as well as from certain foreign companies doing business in Israel; and sanctions. This explains why the campaign to delegitimize Israel often is referred to, inadequately and misleadingly, simply as the BDS movement.

There is no central address orchestrating all of the delegitimization activity. Rather we see a loose network of NGOs across the globe, sometimes coalescing around particular spheres, such as the U.S. Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel.

Mainline Protestant churches, universities, municipalities and corporations have processed divestment initiatives, which in virtually every case have failed to gain traction. The divestment language in a 2004 resolution adopted by the Presbyterian Church USA has since been rescinded, but the issue continues to capture the imagination of Israel’s detractors in that church and others.

Israeli cultural events have been subject to boycott attempts, such as the performances of the Israeli ballet now touring the United States and the Toronto Film Festival last fall, which was dedicated to Tel Aviv’s 100th anniversary.

Campuses have been particular targets, with Israel Apartheid Week taking place the first two weeks in March. The delegitimizers prey on those who lack basic knowledge about the complex nature of Middle East politics — people who can easily fall victim to their simplistic and often inaccurate narratives.

In parallel to the NGOs, governments, especially operating through deeply biased U.N. bodies such as the Geneva-based Human Rights Council, continue to promulgate material that fairly can be described as delegitimizing long after revocation of the 1975 resolution equating Zionism with racism.

The Goldstone report, which grossly distorts the reality of Israel’s efforts to combat an amoral adversary in Gaza that uses civilians as human shields — is the latest in a long line of hostile actions emanating from the council.

Accusations of war crimes and crimes against humanity eagerly get picked up by the delegitimization organizations and coalitions as valuable weapons in their arsenals.

Indeed, public international law has increasingly been utilized as a rationale for imposing political and economic sanctions against Israel.

Re’ut, an Israel-based think tank, recently completed an analysis of the issue and concluded that “while Israel’s delegitimizers come from relatively marginal forces in Europe, their effectiveness stems from their ability to engage and mobilize others. This is accomplished by branding Israel as a pariah and ‘apartheid’ state, identifying ‘outstanding issues’ — such as the ‘Gaza blockade,’ ’settlements,’ ‘the separation wall,’ ‘occupation,’ ‘disproportionate use of force,’ or ‘human rights violations’ — and rallying their coalition around it; making pro-Palestinian activity trendy; promoting boycotts, divestments and sanctions; and, most importantly, blurring the line separating them from those that criticize Israeli policy yet do not delegitimize it.”

Re’ut points out that “the delegitimizers work ‘from the periphery to the center’ and ‘bottom-up, thriving in social networks and on the Internet. Hence, while in formal policy spheres Israel’s diplomatic position remains relatively strong and solid, its standing among the general public and intellectual elites is being eroded.”

It is true that Israel’s “diplomatic position” for the time being remains strong both with the U.S. government and the American people. However, as the JCPA resolution on countering the delegitimization campaign adopted at our recent annual conference maintains, “unless effectively countered, over time it may have the corrosive effect of changing the culture of political discussion and making it harder for people of goodwill to publicly support Israel. If support for Israel begins to be seen as de facto racism, this could provide fertile ground for the growth of anti-Semitism.”

The delegitimization campaign, unfortunately, has made significant inroads in other parts of the world. Friends of Israel in this country cannot afford to be complacent. The community relations field — with motivated activists in our own community joined by non-Jewish allies who come to this cause based on relationships forged around a range of joint efforts in the social justice and human rights arenas — is well positioned to develop a strategic and comprehensive response to this challenge.

We must act now to prevent the clouds from becoming a full-fledged storm.


HELP COUNTER ANTI-ISRAEL EFFORTS IN NEW MEXICO

By Sam Sokolove on Wednesday, February 24th, 2010 at 6:15 pm
Categories: Advocacy

An anti-Israel group calling itself the New Mexico Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Committee will be leading an effort on Sunday, February 28th, between 12:00pm and 2:00pm at Trader Joe’s in Albuquerque (Uptown) in their on-going “de-shelving campaign of Israeli consumer products.” This is part of the same group responsible for the anti-Israel billboards seen around Albuquerque.

While some may dismiss this as the efforts of a small group of local anti-Israel activists, we regard BDS (Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions) groups with the utmost seriousness and urgency.

Trader Joe’s has assured the Anti-Defamation League that they will not acquiesce to this boycott demand and will continue to sell Israeli products. We urge friends of Israel to make a point of thanking Trader Joe’s management for stocking Israel products and by purchasing Israeli foods anytime you shop.

Israeli products at Trader Joe’s include: Dorot Crushed Garlic; Dorot Chopped Cilantro; Holyland Matzos; Pastures of Eden Feta Imported; Trader Joe’s Israeli Couscous, and Trader Joe’s Harvest Grains Blend.

Background

• In recent years, the campaign to delegitimize and demonize Israel has intensified. This campaign distorts the history and national aspirations of the Jewish people to live in peace in a homeland to which we have been connected continuously and profoundly for more than three millennia.

• The legitimate right of Israel to defend itself from terror often is ignored, and the campaign to delegitimize Israel serves as a distraction from the critical task of trying to bring peace to the Middle East.

• BDS campaigns suggest that international pressure can replace efforts to negotiate in good faith. These activities detract from the goal of a lasting and solid peace based on co-existence and productive economic relations.

• To be clear: Israeli policy and actions are not beyond criticism; but we have witnessed a continuing flow of inaccurate charges of human rights violations and outrageous comparisons of Israel to apartheid South Africa and even to Nazi Germany.

• Common to most BDS calls are distortions and outright fabrications of facts, misrepresentations of international law, and a false assertion that the proffered action somehow will improve the prospects for Israeli-Palestinian peace. Often, the very existence of a state for the Jewish people is perceived as the root of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

• Those opposed to the existence of the State of Israel are tenacious and will continue to intensify their campaign globally, within local communities and on the campuses. It is imperative that our community remain vigilant to the BDS campaign and respond to it with vigor.

• Unless effectively countered, over time BDS efforts may have the corrosive effect of changing the culture of political discussion and making it harder for people of goodwill to publicly support Israel. If support for Israel begins to be seen as de facto racism, this could provide fertile ground for the growth of anti-Semitism.

• Those seeking to hasten peace should focus on efforts of reconciliation, including investment in the many meaningful coexistence programs that are necessary to foster a generation of Israelis and Palestinians, which will work and live side-by-side and move past the teaching of hate and violence.


The Goldstone Report: What You Need To Know

By Sam Sokolove on Friday, September 25th, 2009 at 7:41 am
Categories: Advocacy, Israel, News

From the Jewish Council for Public Affairs:  

The Goldstone Report, the result of the United Nations Human Rights Council Fact-Finding Mission on Israel’s Operation Cast Lead — which alleges that Israel “committed actions amounting to war crimes, possibly crimes against humanity” — was published on September 15, 2009. This Report evoked outrage throughout Israel, including from President Shimon Peres who declared that it “makes a mockery of history and fails to distinguish between aggressor and those acting in self-defense.”

The State Department is continuing to review the Report. Assistant Secretary Philip Crowley said, “there was a one-sided unacceptable mandate for this fact-finding investigation and that mandate was set forth before the United States joined the Human Rights Council. We should be cautious at this point that the Report should not be used as a mechanism to add impediments to getting back to the peace process.”

Ambassador Susan E. Rice, U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations, stated, “The United States is reviewing very carefully what is a very lengthy document. We have long expressed our very serious concern with the mandate that was given by the Human Rights Council prior to our joining the Council, which we viewed as unbalanced, one sided and basically unacceptable. We have very serious concerns about many of the recommendations in the report. We will expect and believe that the appropriate venue for this report to be considered is the Human Rights Council and that is our strong view. And most importantly our view is that we need to be focused on the future. This is a time to work to cement progress towards the resumptions of negotiations and their early and successful conclusion and our efforts, and we hope the efforts of others, will be directed to that end.”

Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Chairman of the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia, called the report a “pompous, tendentious, one-sided political diatribe.” Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), ranking Republican member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the UN is “continuing its relentless anti-Israel bias” and that Congress must enact “pending legislation that would leverage our contributions to the UN to produce sweeping, meaningful reform of that body.”

We hope that in the days ahead the administration will more clearly and sharply repudiate the Report, and more members of Congress and prominent members of the community, especially lawyers and jurists, will speak out as well.

The following talking points should be utilized:

• Israel’s military operation in Gaza took place after thousands of rockets had rained down on population centers for many years resulting in many deaths and injuries and making life for almost one million people a constant nightmare. It should also be remembered that Israel had completely withdrawn from the Gaza Strip and dismantled every settlement there in the hope that this step would create conditions conducive to peace.

• After unsuccessful efforts to prevent the rocket attacks through non-violent means, Israel, exercising its right of self-defense, launched a military operation against the terrorists in Gaza. Hamas combatants, not wearing military uniforms and against international legal norms and basic morality, embedded themselves in heavily populated civilian areas, using apartment complexes, schools, mosques and hospitals as bases of operation.

• Israel, as it has always done under these extremely difficult circumstances, made serious efforts to target combatants in ways that would limit noncombatant casualties. Unfortunately, in times of war, especially this kind of asymmetric warfare, mistakes will be made, and tragically, innocent lives will be lost. That certainly was the case in Gaza, as it has been in the wars being fought by American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Both Israel and the U.S. are learning about the challenges and dilemmas posed by conflict with an adversary that glorifies the “martyrdom” of women and children.

• Unlike the terrorists and authoritarian regimes, Israel, as a democracy with self-correcting mechanisms, acknowledges its mistakes and conducts serious, credible, and ongoing examinations of its military conduct, not because a biased UN body calls for it, but because the IDF seeks to reflect the values of the Jewish people, including the sanctity of life. Those who are found to have violated the IDF’s code of conduct are prosecuted and punished.

• The UN Human Rights Council habitually demonizes and singles-out Israel for criticism, and ignores gross human rights abuses occurring in countries like Iran, Sudan and China. Its activities undermine respect for human rights and the rule of law. We hope that renewed U.S. participation in the Council will result in major reforms.

• Ultimately, the solution to this tragic violence is a successful peace process that will lead to two states for two peoples. The Goldstone Report, unfortunately, will not contribute to that result. It will encourage extremists on the Palestinian side to believe that the UN can be used as a tool in the campaign to deligitmize Israel.


Bring Gilad Shalit Home!

By Sam Sokolove on Wednesday, September 16th, 2009 at 12:01 pm
Categories: Advocacy, News

Dear Friend,

We, Noam and Aviva Shalit, residents of Mizpeh Hila in Israel, parents of Gilad Shalit, are appealing to you, Jews of the United States, with an emotional request from the depths of our heart.

With the coming new Jewish year, with the month of Elul to begin, we want to ask each and every Jew who lives in the United States to feel, think, and devote a number of moments for our son Gilad.

About five years ago our son Gilad was inducted into the IDF (Israel Defense Forces), and like every soldier Gilad swore to be loyal to his homeland and to do his best for the State of Israel.

We, as parents, sent our son to defend the State and its citizens, since this is how it should be. However, after two years we were informed that our son Gilad was kidnapped into the Gaza strip by the Hamas organization, which is recognized as a terrorist organization. He is kept in complete isolation from the outside world, without any basic human rights.

Gilad is in captivity and Gilad is still alive!

We have no idea whether you can feel and understand the concept of captivity, but certainly each one of you can understand the meaning of freedom, the right to freedom that was stolen from you, the right to live as a person.

We have made our life a struggle for Gilad Shalit, we are doing everything possible for this cause.

We are recruiting the citizens of the State of Israel, leaders around the world, politicians, rabbis and many others. However, we are still fighting to receive=2 0a real sign of life from the Red Cross, we are fighting for his rights according to international law.

Every Jew around the world, and in America in particular, has a real motive to lead a peace process in the Middle East and as a friend of Israel can influence the process of Gilad’s release and put pressure on the Red Cross.

Like every family, we want to celebrate the New Year holiday with Gilad, at home, in Mizpeh Hila. Perhaps this is in your hands?

We are asking each and every Jew in America to contact the Red Cross, by email and by telephone, and ask what is going on with our Gilad, and to contact the President of the USA, Barack Obama.

webmaster.gva@icrc.org
ICRC headquarters in GenevaPostal addressInternational Committee of the Red Cross19 Avenue de la PaixCH 1202 Geneva President Barack H Obama

The White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NYWashington, D.C. 20500USA

In addition, please sign the petition that calls for the release of Gilad Shalit. The petition is found at our official website: http://via.readerimpact.com/c/161/e7a213949ed107c653db2f5a90dabd34dd855c0653a61525d85bc17c30f89d3a. Please also send your information to: freegiladny@walla.com (Dr. Hadar)

Each one of you can be a partner in the campaign to bring Gilad home.

This participation fulfills the incomparable religious commandment of redeeming the captives and will benefit you for the coming New Year.

I wish you a Shana Tova.

Noam and Aviva Shalit”


All content Copyright © 2009 by The Jewish Federation of New Mexico
Designed, developed, and maintained by netwmd.com, LLC