Posts in the 'Israel' Category

Some of the Reasons to Invest in Israel

By Sam Sokolove on Wednesday, May 5th, 2010 at 4:45 pm
Categories: General Commentary, Israel

By Yoram Ettinger

1. According to TopForeignStocks.com (May 2, 2010), Some of the reasons to invest in Israel are:

*The banking sector remained stable during the global credit crisis and emerged strong last year. Unlike many banks in the West, none of the banks had any large sub-prime exposure and needed to be bailed out by the state. The five largest banks - Hapoalim group, Bank Leumi Bank, Discount Bank, Mizrahi-Tfahot Bank group and First International Bank - are all well capitalized and their capital adequacy ratio is much higher than the minimum required by Basel standards.

*Israel runs a current account surplus. In 2009, the current account soared 243% to $7.2 billion.

*By the end of this month MSCI will upgrade Israel to a developed market [OECD]. Hence Israel will join this select group of 23 other developed countries in the index.

*The high-tech industry forms a large part of the Israeli economy. While Germany is known for engineering, Israel can be called as a high-tech powerhouse. Some have called the incredible growth of the hi-tech industry in a short period of time as a hi-tech miracle. The country is a global leader in many hi-tech sectors such as electronics, generic pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and aeronautics. Export of products by the hi-tech industry has grown at an annual rate of 8.5% in the last five years. In March 2010, the sector brought in $2.1B in export revenue. In the manufacturing sector, sale of hi-tech products forms the largest source of export revenue as the chart for 2008 shows below.

*Israel has the largest number of companies listed on the NASDAQ than any other country except Canada. This is very significant considering the country’s population is relatively small compared to many other countries such as India, China, Brazil, UK, France, etc.

*A December, 2009 Bank of America Merrill Lynch report titled “Playing Defense” recommended Israel as an attractive investment destination and recommended companies especially in the banks and telecom sector.

According to Merrill Lynch, some of the reasons for investing in Israel were the strong currency vs. the US dollar, the resilient economic performance among other emerging markets and the strong leadership performance shown by The Bank of Israel and Israel’s Ministry of Finance in handling the economy.

*The rate of investment in research and development as percentage of GDP in Israel is the highest in the world. High R&D spending coupled with a highly skilled and educated workforce spawns hundreds of start-ups producing many successful commercial products. Israel has the highest number of scientists and engineers per capita in the world. Hence one of the areas where Israel excels compared to other OECD countries is the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) sector which forms a considerable portion of exports. Little wonder that after Silicon Valley, Israel has the highest concentration of start-ups anywhere in the world.

*Many of Israel’s leading multinational companies weathered the credit crisis and continue to expand both domestically and abroad. Companies like Teva Pharmaceuticals (TEVA), the world’s largest generic drug maker, generate most of their earnings from overseas markets. The Top 25 Israeli multinationals had over US $40B in foreign sales including exports) in 2008. The top five firms in this category are Israel Corporation, Elco Holdings, Teva, Amdocs (DOX) and Ormat (ORA).

*Some of the other factors that make Israel an attractive destination for investment are: general government consumption accounts for a small portion of the total GDP, relative low unemployment rate, stable and growing housing market, very low growth in debt to GDP during 2009, the Tel-Aviv 25 Index beating the S&P 500 over the last five years, etc.

2. The $1.8BN NY-based private equity fund, Pegasus Capital Advisors, has increased its Israel-dedicated fund by $150MN, focusing on water technologies, alternative energy and homeland security technologies. Pegasus invested $100MN in Israeli companies during 2005-8, acquiring controlling interest in 5 companies (Globes business daily, April 5, 2010).
3. The European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7), which supports exceptional R&D projects, awarded 17MN Euros to 34 Israeli companies and researchers. The total received by Israeli companies and academic researchers, from the FP7 amounts to 290MN Euros (Globes, May 3).

4. Canada’s Enablence has acquired Israel’s Teledata for $50MN (Globes, April 16). Google made its 1st Israeli acquisition - LabPixies for $25MN (April 28).


Top Ten Lies About Israel

By Sam Sokolove on Wednesday, May 5th, 2010 at 10:19 am
Categories: Advocacy, Israel

By Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center

It’s no secret to anyone that relations between the United States and Israel reflect a new reality and are not what they once were. The last few months have seen a worldwide frenzy of intimidation and threats directed against Israel that has backed its supporters into a corner. Very few have raised their voices in response.

For this reason, the Simon Wiesenthal Center has produced a new brochure, “2010 Top Ten Anti-Israel Lies,” that we will be distributing to millions of people worldwide. The brochure also provides contact information for U.S. and world leaders and key news bureaus.

Here is a condensed summary of the 10 top lies and the center’s responses:

Lie No. 1: Israel was created by European guilt over the Nazi Holocaust. Why should Palestinians pay the price?

Three thousand years before the Holocaust, before there was a Roman Empire, Israel’s kings and prophets walked the streets of Jerusalem. The whole world knows that Isaiah did not speak his prophesies from Portugal, nor Jeremiah his lamentations from France. Revered by its people, Jerusalem is mentioned in the Hebrew Scriptures 600 times, but not once in the Koran. Throughout the 2,000-year exile of the Jews, there was a continuous Jewish presence in the Holy Land.

Lie No. 2: Had Israel withdrawn to its June 1967 borders, peace would have come long ago.

Since 1967, Israel repeatedly has conceded “land for peace.” Following Egyptian President Sadat’s historic 1977 visit to Jerusalem, Israel withdrew from the vast Sinai Peninsula and has been at peace with Egypt ever since. But the Palestinian Authority has never fulfilled its promise to end propaganda attacks nor drop the Palestinian National Charter’s call for Israel’s destruction. In 2000, Prime Minister Barak offered Yasser Arafat full sovereignty more than 97 percent of the West Bank, a corridor to Gaza, and a capital in the Arab section of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.

Lie No. 3: Israel is the main stumbling block to achieving a two-state solution.

The Palestinians themselves are the only stumbling block to achieving a two-state solution. With whom should Israel negotiate? With President Abbas, who for four years has been barred by Hamas from visiting 1.5 million constituents in Gaza? With his Palestinian Authority, which continues to glorify terrorists and preaches hate in its educational system and the media? With Hamas, whose Iranian-backed leaders deny the Holocaust and use fanatical Jihadist rhetoric to call for Israel’s destruction?

Lie No. 4: Nuclear Israel, not Iran, is the greatest threat to peace and stability.

The United States and Europe can afford to wait to see what the Iranian regime does with its nuclear ambitions, but Israel cannot. Israel is on the front lines and remembers every day the price the Jewish people paid for not taking Hitler at his word. Israel is not prepared to sacrifice another 6 million Jews on the altar of the world’s indifference.

Lie No. 5: Israel is an apartheid state deserving of international boycott, divestment and sanctions campaigns.

In fact, Israel is a democratic state. Its 20 percent Arab minority enjoys all the political, economic and religious rights and freedoms of citizenship, including electing members of their choice to the Knesset (Parliament).

Lie No. 6: Plans to build 1,600 more homes in East Jerusalem prove Israel is “Judaizing” the Holy City.

Ramat Shlomo was not about Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem but about a long established, heavily populated Jewish neighborhood in northern Jerusalem, where 250,000 Jews live (about the size of Newark, N.J.) — an area that will never be relinquished by Israel.

Lie No. 7: Israeli policies endanger U.S. troops in Afghanistan and Iraq.

A resolution of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict would benefit everyone, including the United States. But an imposed return to what Abba Eban called “1967 Auschwitz borders” would endanger Israel’s survival and ultimately be disastrous for American interests and credibility in the world.

Lie No. 8: Israeli policies are the cause of worldwide anti-Semitism.

From the Inquisition to the pogroms, to the 6 million Jews murdered by the Nazis, history proves that Jew hatred existed on a global scale before the creation of the State of Israel. It would still exist in 2010 even if Israel had never been created. For example, one poll indicates that 40 percent of Europeans blame the recent global economic crisis on “Jews having too much economic power” — a canard that has nothing to do with Israel.

Lie No. 9: Israel, not Hamas, is responsible for the “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza. Goldstone was right when he charged that Israel was guilty of war crimes against civilians.

The United Nations Human Rights Council is obsessed with false anti-Israel resolutions. It refuses to address grievous human rights abuses in Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Cuba and beyond. Faced with similar attacks, every U.N. member-state, including the United States and Canada, surely would have acted more aggressively than the Israel Defense Forces did in Gaza.

Lie No. 10: The only hope for peace is a single, binational state eliminating the Jewish State of Israel.

The one-state solution is a non-starter because it would eliminate the Jewish homeland. However, the current pressures on Israel are equally dangerous. In effect, the world is demanding that Israel, the size of New Jersey, shrink further by accepting a three-state solution: a P.A. state on the West Bank and a Hamas terrorist one in Gaza. All this as Hezbollah, Iran’s proxy in Lebanon, stockpiles 50,000 rockets, threatening northern and central Israel’s main population centers. Current polls show that while most Israelis favor a two-state solution, most Palestinians continue to oppose it.

Full versions of the brochure are available by e-mailing toptenlies@wiesenthal.net or calling (800) 900-9036. The online edition is available at http://www.wiesenthal.com/toptenlies.


The Ugly Truth about Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (DBS)

By Sam Sokolove on Thursday, March 25th, 2010 at 1:54 pm
Categories: Advocacy, Israel

“Every war against the Jews has begun with first demonizing us.”

Michael Oren, Israel’s ambassador to the U.S.

In recent years, the campaign to delegitimize and demonize Israel, which began in earnest at the 2001 UN Conference against Racism in Durban, has intensified. This campaign distorts the history and national aspirations of the Jewish people to live in peace in a homeland to which they have been connected continuously and profoundly for more than three millennia.

The legitimate right of Israel to defend itself from terror often is ignored. Israeli policy and actions are not beyond criticism; but we have witnessed a continuing flow of inaccurate charges of human rights violations and outrageous comparisons of Israel to apartheid South Africa and even to Nazi Germany.

Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions is part of a grand design to destroy Israel and her credibility in the world.

According to Abraham Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League, “(BDS”) is about the three ‘D’s”: Demonization, Deligitimization, and Applying a Double Standard.”

Tactics of BDS:

  • Denying Israel’s cultural products;
  • Denying Israel’s emissaries the right to be heard;
  • Equating Israel to Apartheid-era South Africa;
  • Delegitimizing the Jewish historical ties to Israel;
  • Portraying Zionism not as an expression of Peoplehood, but as an extension of European colonialization;
  •  Equating Zionism to Nazism.

This is all anti-Semitism

BDS may seem innocuous, but we must understand what BDS proponents really want: Israel could be strangled economically and culturally if people of good concemeince do not counter this campaign.

  • The campaign to delegitimize Israel and the BDS movement, serves as a distraction from the critical task of trying to bring peace to the Middle East;
  • The promotion of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions against Israel evidences a troubling double standard – singling out Israel for blame;
  • The use of boycotts, divestment, and sanctions in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian-Arab conflict is an effort to reward intransigence by suggesting that international pressure can replace efforts to negotiate in good faith.

Those opposed to the existence of the State of Israel are tenacious and will continue to intensify their campaign globally, within local communities and on the campuses.

You Can Fight Back!

  • Confront boycott campaigns with campaigns to purchase Israeli goods or partner with Israeli organizations, with the aim of ensuring that every boycott campaign is a net failure;
  • Respond swiftly to false or distorted media statements about Israel;
  • Invest in programs that promote peace and reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians;
  • Vigorously combat slanderous attacks, including anti-Semitic fabrications that have been levied against Israelis that are reminiscent of the ancient blood libel.

David Harris: It’s Not About Israel

By Sam Sokolove on Monday, January 11th, 2010 at 9:06 am
Categories: Israel

by David Harris
Executive Director, American Jewish Committee

There are those in the international community who claim that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the root cause of the Middle East’s problems. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair has been among the most prominent of these voices.

In his article “A Battle For Global Values” (Foreign Affairs, January/February 2007), Tony Blair reiterated what he has expressed in previous public statements: “How can we bring peace to the Middle East unless we resolve the question of Israel and Palestine?” Achieving peace, he continues, “would not only silence reactionary Islam’s most effective rallying call but fatally undermine its basic ideology.”

More recently, in a speech at the Istanbul Forum in October, Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan named the lack of a Palestinian state as the crux of all problems in the Middle East. In so saying, he echoed a speech by his own Foreign Minister, Ali Babacan, at the Annapolis conference, who declared that “the Palestinian question is at the epicenter of all problems in the Middle East. The resulting climate of despair, hatred and pessimism continues to haunt the region and create a breeding ground for extremism.”

Similarly, Aijaz Zaka Syed, a columnist for the Dubai-based, English-language newspaper Khaleej Times, wrote in November that “the key to…world peace lies in Jerusalem.”

True, genuine peace between Israel and the Palestinians would remove one of the long-standing conflicts in the Middle East. Moreover, to state the painfully obvious, peace would serve the best interests of those involved.
But the suggestion made by Prime Ministers Blair, Erdogan and others that such a settlement is a necessary precondition for wider peace in the Middle East and would take the wind out of radical Islam’s sails is unsupported by the facts.

Let’s assume for a moment that Israel did not exist. Would that have changed the basic story line of the bulk of events in the Middle East?
Would Yemen today be fighting a war on three fronts against its own rebel movements and al Qaeda?

Would Iraq and Iran have chosen not to pursue an eight-year war that cost more than a million fatalities? Would Iraq have decided not to invade Kuwait in 1990? Would it have rethought its use of chemical weapons against both its own Kurdish population and Iran?

Would Syria have refrained from slaughtering over 10,000 of its own citizens in Hama in 1982? Would it have withheld its central role in the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri?
Would Saudi Arabia have stopped exporting its Wahhabi model of Islam, with its narrow, doctrinaire view of the world and rejection of non-Muslims as so-called infidels, across the globe?

Would al Qaeda not have attacked the U.S. in 2001, when, it should be remembered, the Israeli-Palestinian issue was never even mentioned among Osama bin Laden’s list of “grievances?”

Would the danger posed by the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Jordan magically disappear absent the Israel factor?

Would Iran today abandon its nuclear and hegemonic ambitions in the region?
Would the Shi’ite-Sunni split, with its profound political and strategic ramifications, evaporate into thin air?

Would the Sudanese government have stopped its collusion with the Arab Janjaweed militias to end the massive murder and displacement in Darfur?
Would the desperate poverty and widespread illiteracy that dampen hope and create a fertile recruiting ground for radical Islamic movements suddenly be alleviated?

Would Saudi women instantaneously have the right to drive, would non-Muslims finally enjoy equal rights in all those Arab countries where Islam is the official religion, and would the Baha’i no longer experience persecution at the hands of the Iranian government?

In reality, the destabilizing factors in the Middle East run far deeper than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Strikingly, while most Western political leaders mince their words, the courageous Arab authors of the annual Arab Human Development Report have not. They have spoken of three overarching explanatory factors for the region’s unsatisfactory condition: the knowledge deficit, the gender deficit and the freedom deficit.

Unless these three areas are addressed in a sustained manner, the Middle East, which ought to be one of the world’s most dynamic regions, is likely to continue suffering from instability, violence and fundamentalism, irrespective of what happens on the Israeli-Palestinian front.

Consider some of the important findings in recent Arab Human Development Reports and related studies:
• The total number of books translated into Arabic in the last 1,000 years is fewer than those translated in Spain in one year.
• Greece – with a population of fewer than 11 million – translates five times as many books from abroad into Greek annually as the 22 Arab countries combined – with a total population of more than 300 million – translate into Arabic.
• According to a Council on Foreign Relations report, “in the 1950s, per-capita income in Egypt was similar to South Korea, whereas Egypt’s per-capita income today is less than 20 percent of South Korea’s. Saudi Arabia had a higher gross domestic product than Taiwan in the 1950s; today it is about 50 percent of Taiwan’s.”
As Dr. A.B. Zahlan, a Palestinian physicist, has noted: “A regressive political culture is at the root of the Arab world’s failure to fund scientific research or to sustain a vibrant, innovative community of scientists.” He further asserted that “Egypt, in 1950, had more engineers than all of China.” That is hardly the case today.

A recent UN Human Development Report revealed that only two Egyptians per million people were granted patents (for Syria the figure was zero), compared to 30 in Greece and 35 in Israel.

In the same UN report, the adult literacy rate for women aged 15 and older was 43.6 percent in Egypt and 74 percent in Syria, while for the world’s top 20 countries it was nearly 100 percent.

And finally, according to the current Freedom House rankings, no Arab country in the Middle East is listed as “free.” Each is described at best as “partly free” or, worse, “not free.”

The sad truth is that it is precisely political oppression, intellectual suffocation and gender discrimination that explain, far more than other factors, the chronic difficulties of the Middle East.

To be sure, there exist no overnight or over-the-counter remedies for these maladies that would allow the region to unleash its vast potential, but let’s be clear: they, not the straw man of Israel, are at the heart of the problem.

It would be illusory to think otherwise.


The Goldstone Report: What You Need To Know

By Sam Sokolove on Friday, September 25th, 2009 at 7:41 am
Categories: Advocacy, Israel, News

From the Jewish Council for Public Affairs:  

The Goldstone Report, the result of the United Nations Human Rights Council Fact-Finding Mission on Israel’s Operation Cast Lead — which alleges that Israel “committed actions amounting to war crimes, possibly crimes against humanity” — was published on September 15, 2009. This Report evoked outrage throughout Israel, including from President Shimon Peres who declared that it “makes a mockery of history and fails to distinguish between aggressor and those acting in self-defense.”

The State Department is continuing to review the Report. Assistant Secretary Philip Crowley said, “there was a one-sided unacceptable mandate for this fact-finding investigation and that mandate was set forth before the United States joined the Human Rights Council. We should be cautious at this point that the Report should not be used as a mechanism to add impediments to getting back to the peace process.”

Ambassador Susan E. Rice, U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations, stated, “The United States is reviewing very carefully what is a very lengthy document. We have long expressed our very serious concern with the mandate that was given by the Human Rights Council prior to our joining the Council, which we viewed as unbalanced, one sided and basically unacceptable. We have very serious concerns about many of the recommendations in the report. We will expect and believe that the appropriate venue for this report to be considered is the Human Rights Council and that is our strong view. And most importantly our view is that we need to be focused on the future. This is a time to work to cement progress towards the resumptions of negotiations and their early and successful conclusion and our efforts, and we hope the efforts of others, will be directed to that end.”

Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY), Chairman of the House Subcommittee on the Middle East and South Asia, called the report a “pompous, tendentious, one-sided political diatribe.” Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), ranking Republican member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said the UN is “continuing its relentless anti-Israel bias” and that Congress must enact “pending legislation that would leverage our contributions to the UN to produce sweeping, meaningful reform of that body.”

We hope that in the days ahead the administration will more clearly and sharply repudiate the Report, and more members of Congress and prominent members of the community, especially lawyers and jurists, will speak out as well.

The following talking points should be utilized:

• Israel’s military operation in Gaza took place after thousands of rockets had rained down on population centers for many years resulting in many deaths and injuries and making life for almost one million people a constant nightmare. It should also be remembered that Israel had completely withdrawn from the Gaza Strip and dismantled every settlement there in the hope that this step would create conditions conducive to peace.

• After unsuccessful efforts to prevent the rocket attacks through non-violent means, Israel, exercising its right of self-defense, launched a military operation against the terrorists in Gaza. Hamas combatants, not wearing military uniforms and against international legal norms and basic morality, embedded themselves in heavily populated civilian areas, using apartment complexes, schools, mosques and hospitals as bases of operation.

• Israel, as it has always done under these extremely difficult circumstances, made serious efforts to target combatants in ways that would limit noncombatant casualties. Unfortunately, in times of war, especially this kind of asymmetric warfare, mistakes will be made, and tragically, innocent lives will be lost. That certainly was the case in Gaza, as it has been in the wars being fought by American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Both Israel and the U.S. are learning about the challenges and dilemmas posed by conflict with an adversary that glorifies the “martyrdom” of women and children.

• Unlike the terrorists and authoritarian regimes, Israel, as a democracy with self-correcting mechanisms, acknowledges its mistakes and conducts serious, credible, and ongoing examinations of its military conduct, not because a biased UN body calls for it, but because the IDF seeks to reflect the values of the Jewish people, including the sanctity of life. Those who are found to have violated the IDF’s code of conduct are prosecuted and punished.

• The UN Human Rights Council habitually demonizes and singles-out Israel for criticism, and ignores gross human rights abuses occurring in countries like Iran, Sudan and China. Its activities undermine respect for human rights and the rule of law. We hope that renewed U.S. participation in the Council will result in major reforms.

• Ultimately, the solution to this tragic violence is a successful peace process that will lead to two states for two peoples. The Goldstone Report, unfortunately, will not contribute to that result. It will encourage extremists on the Palestinian side to believe that the UN can be used as a tool in the campaign to deligitmize Israel.


LUNCH AND TWO SCREENINGS OF “THE SILENT EXODUS”

By Sam Sokolove on Monday, September 21st, 2009 at 8:20 am
Categories: Israel, News

Twice on Thursday, Sept 24, at 11 am and 12:30 pm in the Luminaria Room, Top Floor of the SUB at the University of New Mexico.

MENU: Bagels, Cream Cheese and Coffee

The 2004, 59 minute film “The Silent Exodus” is about the Jewish refugees from Arab countries after 1948. Directed by Pierre Rehov, it is largely in French and Hebrew with English subtitles. Interviews with survivors of Arab pogroms and prominent scholars elucidate the forced departure of these Jews from their longtime homes. Vintage footage and newspaper headlines show the connection between the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem and Adolph Hitler, and the role of the pro-Nazi regime that ruled in Iraq during WWII. As these Jewish refugees were succored by and absorbed into Israel, their story has been lost to history. The Arab-Israeli conflict resulted in two refugee populations, but only one has been acknowledged.


Trader Joe’s Boycott: Take Action!

By Sam Sokolove on Thursday, June 18th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Categories: Israel, News, Uncategorized

It has come to our attention that the anti-Israel groups under the umbrella of the “U.S. Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel” recently sent form letters to Trader Joe’s headquarters demanding the company stop carrying Israeli products as these products “help fund an economy based on illegal occupation and apartheid.”

The Anti-Defamation League Central Pacific office sent a letter to Trader Joe’s and received a response from Jon Basalone, Trader Joe’s Senior Vice President of Marketing. He wrote, “We have received a few letters [threatening a boycott] like this via our customer relations email. Our response is that we sell products, and do not use our products as political tools or to make any statements about any political causes. We have no intention of removing any products based on pressure from any group, no matter what they support or don’t support. As always, we believe our customers are smart, and they are capable of making decisions about what they purchase.”

Anti-Israel activists in Pittsburgh walked into a Trader Joe’s and proceeded to pull Israeli goods and distribute misinformation materials to customers before being removed for trespassing. Additionally we have heard word about this from the JCRCs in Nashville and Silicon Valley.

The anti-Israel groups have called for a national day of de-shelving Israeli products from Trader Joe’s stores on Saturday, June 20, World Refugee Day.

Suggested Actions

• We encourage community members to shop at Trader Joe’s stores and to specifically buy Israeli products, particularly before and during the weekend of June 20. It would be fantastic if all the Israeli products are gone before the boycotters arrive.

• Israeli products carried at Trader Joe’s include: Dorot Crushed Garlic, Dorot Chopped Cilantro, Holyland Matzos, Pastures of Eden Feta Imported, Trader Joe’s Israeli Couscous and Trader Joe’s Harvest Grains Blend.

• Tell managers at Trader Joe’s stores that you really like the Israeli products they carry and hope they will carry more in the future.

• Alert managers that June 20 has been declared as a day to de-shelve Israeli products and they should be aware of any people who may try to vandalize, shoplift, or deface the products in any way.


Passover Guide for the Perplexed 2009

By Sam Sokolove on Tuesday, April 7th, 2009 at 7:50 am
Categories: Israel

Passover Guide for the Perplexed 2009
By Yoram Ettinger

1. David Ben Gurion, the Founding Father of Israel (UN Commission, 1947): “300 years ago, the Mayflower launched its historical voyage. How many remember the data of the voyage, how many passengers were on the Mayflower and what kind of bread did they consume? However, 3,300 years earlier, the Exodus from Egypt took place. Every Jew knows the date of the Exodus – 15th of the month of Nissan – and the kind of bread – Matza, leaven bread – consumed. Until today, Jews all over the world, tell the story of the Exodus and eat Matza on the 15th of Nissan. They conclude the story of the Exodus [Hagadah] with the statement: ‘This year we’re slaves, but next year we shall be liberated; this year we’re here, but next year in Jerusalem.’” The prayer Next Year in Jerusalem is recited twice a year: Yom Kippur and Passover, the most sublime spiritual and physical Jewish experiences.

2. Passover highlights the fact that the Jewish People have been passed-over by history’s angel of death, in defiance of conventional wisdom. Non-normative salvation has characterized Jewish history ever since the Exodus, the Parting of the Sea, destruction of the Temple, exiles, pogroms, expulsions, Holocaust, Communist and other forms of Anti-Semitism, on-going Arab/Muslim wars and terrorism, etc. However, the involvement of Moses, Aaron, Joshua, Caleb and Nachshon (the first to jump into the Red Sea before its parting) attests to the crucial role played by principle-driven leaders.

3. Passover commemorates the transformation from Diaspora- slavery to national-deliverance. The difference between the spelling of Ge’oolah (deliverance in Hebrew) and Golah (Diaspora in Hebrew) is the first Hebrew letter Alef, the root of the Alpha-Bet. The Hebrew spelling of critical root values and terms begins with Alef: G-D, Truth, Faith, Covenant, Credibility, Awesome, Power, Abraham, Light, Father, Mother, Love, Soil, Adam, Courage, Spring, Unity, Food, Responsibility, Immortality/Everlasting, Cure, Horizon, Patrimony, Tree. In order to transform (personal or national) Diaspora into Deliverance one must return to the roots.

4. The Exodus took place around 1,300BC, 600-700 years before Greek philosophers promoted democracy, establishing the Jewish People in the forefront in the on-going battle against rogue regimes. Passover is celebrated on the 15th day of the Jewish month of Nissan – the first month of the Jewish year and the introduction of natural and national spring (Nitzan is the Babylonian word for spring and the Hebrew word for bud). Nissan (its root is Ness – miracle in Hebrew) is the month of miracles, such as the Exodus, the Parting of the Sea, Jacob wrestling the Angel, Deborah’s victory over Sisera, Daniel in the Lion’s Den, etc. The 15th day of any Jewish month is endowed with full moon, which stands for optimism in defiance of darkness and awesome odds. It is consistent with 15 parts of the Hagadah (the chronicles of Passover), 15 generations between Abraham’s message of monotheism and Solomon’s construction of the first Temple and the 15th day of the Jewish month of Shvat, Arbor Day – the “Exodus” of vegetation.

5. Passover has four names: Holiday of Pesach (Passed-over; sacrifice), Holiday of Liberty, Holiday of Matza and Holiday of Spring. It is the first Jewish holiday, according to the Jewish calendar, which starts in the spring (Aviv in Hebrew, which consists of two Hebrew words: Father of 12 months), the bud of nature. The word spring is mentioned 3 times in the Torah, all in reference to Exodus. Passover – which commemorates the creation of the Jewish nation - lasts for 7 days, just like the creation of the universe. Passover is the first Jewish pilgrimage and the basis for the other two annual pilgrimages. Thus, the first stop of the Exodus was at Soukkota (Soukkot/Tabernacles - the 3rd pilgrimage), and Passover is the prelude to the receipt of the Torah/Ten Commandments (Shavou’ot/Pentecost - the 2nd pilgrimage).

6. Passover (role model of Liberty/Exodus) interacts with Pentecost (role model of Morality/Ten Commandments), since Liberty interacts with Morality. The one constitutes a prerequisite for the other. The absence of one means the absence of the other. The Liberty-Morality interaction/interdependence distinguishes Western democracies from rogue regimes. No appeasing-rhetoric would transform rogue regime into a free/moral entity. Herut is the Hebrew word for Liberty and Harut (spelled with identical Hebrew words) is the Hebrew word for Inscription, which refers to the Ten Commandments.

7. Passover – just like monotheism, the Sabbath, Ten Commandments, repentance/Yom Kippur – constitutes a Jewish gift to humanity. It constitutes inspiration to liberty and to national liberation (”Let My People Go”). Jews have been targeted by enemies of Liberty (from Pharaoh, Nazism, Communism to Palestinian/Arab/Islamic terrorism and Ahmadinejad), because Jews have been rightly perceived as the messengers of liberty as a God-given natural right and equality before the law.

8. Moses, the hero of Passover, has become a role model of principled leadership. Moses’ name is mentioned only once in the Passover Hagadah, as a servant of G-d, a testimony to Moses’ humility, in order to humanize – rather than deify – Moses and to highlight the role of God in the Exodus. Similarly, Moses’ grave site is purposely unknown, and the only compliment accorded by the Torah to Moses – a prime leader in human history - is “the humblest of all human beings”. The Mosaic legacy has greatly impacted US democracy, hence Moses’ marble replica at the House Chamber on Capitol Hill, at the Rayburn House Office Building’s subway station and at the Supreme Court (holding the Ten Commandments).

9. Passover inspired Puritans, Pilgrims and the US Founding Fathers:

*George Washington and John Adams were compared to Moses and Joshua.
*Adams, Jefferson and Franklin proposed the Parting of the Sea as the official US seal.
*John Locke considered Moses’ 613 Laws as the most fitting legal foundation of the new society in America.
*Ezra Styles, the President of Yale University, stated that “Moses, the man of God, assembled three million people – the number of people in the America in 1776…” (May 8, 1783).
*President Calvin Coolidge: “The Hebraic mortars cemented the foundations of American democracy…” (May 3, 1925).
*John Winthrop, the first Governor of Massachusetts: “God has entered into a Covenant with those who are on their way to wilderness in America, just as he had entered into Covenant with the Israelites in the wilderness of Sinai…” (1630 sermon on the Arbella).

They considered themselves “the modern day People of the Covenant “, King George III was “the modern day Pharaoh”, the Atlantic was “the modern day Red Sea” and America was “the modern day Promised Land”.

The term Federalism is based on “Foedus”, the Latin word for “The Covenant.” The Founding Fathers considered the political structure of the 12 Tribes, sustaining semi-independence, governed by their own Governors and by Moses the Chief Executive, Aaron, Joshua and the 70 person Legislature, a model for the 13 colonies and the US political system.

10. The Exodus is mentioned 50 times in the Torah, equal to the 50 years of Jubilee, a historical pivot of liberty (”Proclaim liberty throughout the land to all the inhabitants thereof”, Leviticus, 25, 10, inscribed on the Liberty Bell). 50 days following the Exodus, Moses received the Torah, which includes – according to Jewish tradition – 50 Gates of Wisdom. Where does that leave the 50 States?! The commemoration of the Exodus is one of the 613 Jewish/Mosaic laws. It is highlighted in most Jewish prayers and rituals, such as the daily prayers, the welcoming of the Sabbath, the blessing over wine, each holiday, upon circumcision, at the door step (Mezuzah) of Jewish homes, etc.

11. Passover commemorates the victory of Jewish demography. Jacob arrived to Egypt with 70 members of his family, but Moses launched the Exodus with 600,000 adult males and a total of some 3 million people – quite a demographic momentum. The Exodus was the first case of a massive Jewish immigration (Aliya) to Israel, in defiance of odds and projections – as have been all major Aliya waves since 1948 - but in touch with Jewish history and destiny. A Jewish Demographic tailwind has currently been in motion between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean. While Herzl launched the Zionist voyage – in 1897 - with an 8% Jewish minority west of the Jordan River in 1900, and Ben-Gurion celebrated the 1947 UN vote with a 33% minority, today’s Jewish State is endowed with a 67% majority over 98.5% of the land west of the River (without Gaza) and a 60% majority with Gaza.


Apartheid in Israel? The facts say Otherwise

By Sam Sokolove on Friday, April 3rd, 2009 at 11:25 am
Categories: General Commentary, Israel, Uncategorized

Op-Ed: Apartheid in Israel? The facts say otherwise
By Reda Mansour · April 1, 2009

ATLANTA (JTA) — A few years ago I began an initiative at the Israeli Foreign Ministry aimed at opening a dialogue with Muslim communities in the West. When the first delegations of European and American Muslims started to arrive, they were amazed at the coexistence between Arabs and Jews in Israel.

For many outside of Israel, their perception of the country has been framed by the international media. They have allowed their opinions to be shaped by a constant stream of pictures and articles with one main idea: Between Arabs and Jews there can be only hatred and violence.

With this mind-set, the delegates traveled to Haifa, Israel, one of the most beautiful cities on Earth, a place where beauty is about more than geography. In Haifa, the Muslim delegations visited a major university with an Arab Muslim vice president and many Arab students. They went to markets and offices and observed Arabs and Jews peacefully going about their simple daily lives.

The delegations heard the call to prayer of the muezzin. They visited the mosque of the Ahmadi Islamic sect, Muslims persecuted in many parts of the world who have flourished in Israel, and traveled near the world Baha’i religious center, a faith persecuted in Iran. They met some of the more than 100 Islamic family court judges and talked with the imams who provide religious services; both groups are paid by the Israeli government.

In a regular Israeli parliament session, there are an average of 15 Arab members, some of whom are part of self-proclaimed Zionist parties. Israel has Arab members of parliament and in the Cabinet; it has Arab ambassadors and high-ranking Arab officers in the military.

Yet despite examples of diversity like these, some critics persist in trying to apply the terrible adjective of apartheid to the State of Israel. The facts on the ground, however, show nothing even remotely close to a racist system. For while one can claim that Arabs in Israel do not receive enough government attention or investment in their community, or one can argue that the situation for Israeli Arabs is sensitive as a minority in a country that has gone to war with its Arab neighbors, all of these issues are political and have nothing to do with race.

There is no apartheid in Israel. Nor is there apartheid in Gaza and the West Bank. The territories came under Israeli control in 1967 following the Six-Day War, and over the next 20 years Israel controlled them with nearly no security measures: almost no checkpoints, no fences and no controlled roads.

However, during the first Palestinian uprising in 1987 and again during the 1990s, Israel was forced to toughen its security measures. The country had to protect its citizens because the terrorists of Hamas made suicide bombing their tactic of choice and shopping malls, night clubs, schools and hotels their primary targets.

Before the uprising began, more then 120,000 Palestinians worked in Israel. In every Palestinian household there was at least one person who worked in Israel. The workers entered the country freely and their standard of living was among the highest in the Middle East.

Only after 25 years of controlling the territories and having its citizens targeted by terror did Israel begin to institute the security measures that some are trying to call “apartheid.” That is why it has been so hard to make the charges stick. Israel, like any other country, is not perfect. The country and its diverse population still admittedly face political and security issues. But apartheid? You must be joking.

Israel and the international community are ready for Palestinian freedom and independence. The question is, are the Palestinians?

The greatest problem facing the Palestinians today is not Israel or illusionary “apartheid” but a lack of unified and visionary leadership. Palestinians need to understand that violent action will never yield the results they want and that serving as a useful distraction for the regime in Tehran will never bring prosperity.

The Palestinians need to produce their own Martin Luther King, Jr., Nelson Mandela or Mahatma Gandhi — a leader who will demonstrate to them that nonviolence is a much more successful tool for freedom and coexistence.

(Reda Mansour is an Israeli Druze and the current consul general of Israel to the southeastern United States. Mansour, the author of award-winning poems and short stories, is a longtime activist for dialogue between Israelis and Arabs.)


Sam N. Lehman-Wilzig’s TIPS FOR ISRAEL ADVOCATES

By Sam Sokolove on Wednesday, April 1st, 2009 at 7:53 am
Categories: General Commentary, Israel, Media

Prof. Sam Lehman-Wilzig, the Schusterman Visiting Israeli Scholar, Brown University, visited Albuquerque recently to address the topic of “Can Israel Do a Better PR Job?”

 His facinating discussion offered background on the relationship of the Israeli government to the Israeli media and how this is a major reason for the Israeli governments’ historical complacency and lack of focus on “hasbarah” (professional PR) vis-a-vis explaining its policies to the rest of the world. 

The following are suggestions Professor Lehman-Wilzig offered to Israel advocates as to how they can help as part of Israel’s larger general PR campaign.

 Truth: most Americans don’t care about Foreign Policy unless it really impacts their lives: (1974 oil embargo — gas prices go up!).

Rather, most Americans see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a regional problem, not a local one. “Public opinion is overrated,” says Dr. Lehman-Wilzig. “What is really important (is reaching) the opinion leaders – people who set policy.”  

Main Advocacy Efforts Should Be Focused on:

  • Political leadership itself: AIPAC, for example, goes to officials at the most grassroots level; they go to up- and-comers, make a long-term investment in education and mentorship, and this ultimately influences policy;
  • Social Opinion Makers: Clergy, media personalities, academics.”You never know when a singer will say something positive about Israel; this can be hugely beneficial;”
  • Journalists (print, electronic, radio).  

 Main Advocacy Messages

  • Make sure the basic facts get out — e.g., Arafat’s rejection of 96% of the West Bank; Hamas’ launch of 6,000 missiles, etc. — you’ll be amazed by how little information is actually out there;
  • Try to Persuade: this includes Israel’s right to exist, right to defend herself and the truth that Israel is honestly seeking peace. This isn’t accomplished by browbeating, which may have only a short-term success; persuasion is long-term, civil, and best handled face-to-face;
  • Normalize and Civilize Israel: It’s a place where people can actually live a normal life; it’s technologically advanced nation, a leader in computer tech, etc.  When people read about Israel, 90% of the time it’s in the context of war, crisis – as advocates, we should “lower the disaster quotient” and show the normalcy!  (BTW: this talk happened the same day the polling firm Dahaf, on behalf of the Jerusalem Institute of Market Studies, released a survey revealing that a majority of Israelis are happy — 30 percent, in fact, in fact very happy.

“American Jews don’t have to tote the Israeli government line… it’s our job to learn more about what makes Israel tick,” he says. In other words, the more we see and portray an “Israel beyond the conflict,” the more effective our advocacy work will be.

 


Older Posts »

All content Copyright © 2009 by The Jewish Federation of New Mexico
Designed, developed, and maintained by netwmd.com, LLC